0.16/0.17 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_27974 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.18/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.18/0.39 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.18/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.18/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.18/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.18/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.18/0.39 % CPULimit : 1440 0.18/0.39 % WCLimit : 180 0.18/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:56:15 EDT 2023 0.18/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.37/0.59 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974 0.37/0.60 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.45/0.72 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA. 0.45/0.72 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.72 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting sh10 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting post_as_ho9 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting post_as_ho8 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # pre_casc_4 with pid 28153 completed with status 0 0.45/0.72 # Result found by pre_casc_4 0.45/0.72 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA. 0.45/0.72 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.72 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true) 0.45/0.72 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMFBN 0.45/0.72 # partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN 0.45/0.72 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.45/0.72 # Starting sh1l with 214s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 73s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting new_bool_8 with 126s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting new_bool_9 with 125s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # pre_casc_4 with pid 28160 completed with status 0 0.45/0.72 # Result found by pre_casc_4 0.45/0.72 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA. 0.45/0.72 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.72 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true) 0.45/0.72 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMFBN 0.45/0.72 # partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN 0.45/0.72 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.45/0.72 # Starting sh1l with 214s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 73s (1) cores 0.45/0.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s 0.45/0.72 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.45/0.72 0.45/0.72 # Proof found! 0.45/0.72 # SZS status Theorem 0.45/0.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_22, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_23, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_25, type, in: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_61, type, imp: $o > $o > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_62, type, d_not: $o > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_67, type, l_or: $o > $o > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_77, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_123, type, nat: $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_124, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_127, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_147, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_148, type, d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_149, type, iii: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_162, type, n_ts: $i > $i > $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_189, type, frac: $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_191, type, num: $i > $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_192, type, den: $i > $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_193, type, n_eq: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_194, type, moref: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_195, type, lessf: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_196, type, moreq: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_197, type, lesseq: $i > $i > $o). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_198, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(decl_199, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_d_not, axiom, ((d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:((imp @ ((X36)) @ (~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_d_not)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_imp, axiom, ((imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(((X34)=>(X35))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_imp)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_lessf, axiom, ((lessf)=(^[X1:$i, X220:$i]:((iii @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X220)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X220) @ (den @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_lessf)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_iii, axiom, ((iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X185 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_iii)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_n_eq, axiom, ((n_eq)=(^[X1:$i, X218:$i]:((n_is @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X218)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X218) @ (den @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_n_eq)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_l_or, axiom, ((l_or)=(^[X42:$o]:(imp @ ((d_not @ ((X42))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_l_or)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_moref, axiom, ((moref)=(^[X1:$i, X219:$i]:((d_29_ii @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X219)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X219) @ (den @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_moref)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, ((d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X184))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_d_29_ii)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_all_of)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_is_of)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_lesseq, axiom, ((lesseq)=(^[X1:$i, X222:$i]:((l_or @ ((lessf @ X1 @ X222)) @ ((n_eq @ X1 @ X222)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_lesseq)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(e_is @ nat)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_n_is)). 0.45/0.72 thf(def_moreq, axiom, ((moreq)=(^[X1:$i, X221:$i]:((l_or @ ((moref @ X1 @ X221)) @ ((n_eq @ X1 @ X221)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', def_moreq)). 0.45/0.72 thf(satz48, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ frac))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X350:$i]:((in @ X350 @ frac))) @ (^[X351:$i]:(((lesseq @ X351 @ X1)<=(moreq @ X1 @ X351)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', satz48)). 0.45/0.72 thf(satz38, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ frac))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X469:$i]:((in @ X469 @ frac))) @ (^[X470:$i]:(((n_eq @ X470 @ X1)<=(n_eq @ X1 @ X470)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XfWDGfsb9j/Vampire---4.8_27974', satz38)). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((imp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(((Z0)=>(Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((lessf)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessf])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((n_eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_n_eq])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((l_or)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((((((((Z0)))=>(~($true)))))=>(Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((moref)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moref])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_23, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_26, plain, ((lesseq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1))))))))=>(~($true)))))=>(((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lesseq])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_27, plain, ((lessf)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_28, plain, ((n_eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, def_n_is])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((l_or)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((((((((Z0)))=>(~($true)))))=>(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_16]), c_0_21])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_30, plain, ((moreq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0))))))))=>(~($true)))))=>(((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moreq])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_31, plain, ((moref)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_32, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_33, plain, ((lesseq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1))))))))=>(~($true)))))=>(((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_34, plain, ((moreq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0))))))))=>(~($true)))))=>(((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0)))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ~(![X527:$i]:(((in @ X527 @ frac)=>![X526:$i]:(((in @ X526 @ frac)=>((~(n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ X527) @ (den @ X526)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X526) @ (den @ X527))))=>(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X527) @ (den @ X526)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X526) @ (den @ X527))))=>(~(n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ X527) @ (den @ X526)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X526) @ (den @ X527))))=>(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X526) @ (den @ X527)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X527) @ (den @ X526)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz48])]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_34])])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X558:$i]:(((in @ X558 @ frac)=>![X557:$i]:(((in @ X557 @ frac)=>((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X558) @ (den @ X557)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X557) @ (den @ X558)))=>(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X557) @ (den @ X558)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X558) @ (den @ X557)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz38]), c_0_32]), c_0_28])])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk1_0 @ frac)&((in @ esk2_0 @ frac)&(((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))))|(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))))&(~(n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))))&~(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0))))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])])])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X892:$i, X893:$i]:((~(in @ X892 @ frac)|(~(in @ X893 @ frac)|(~(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X892) @ (den @ X893)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X893) @ (den @ X892)))|(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X893) @ (den @ X892)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X892) @ (den @ X893))))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))))|(e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ~((n_some @ (diffprop @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:(((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4)))|~((in @ X1 @ frac))|~((in @ X4 @ frac))|~((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, (e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk2_0 @ frac), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk1_0 @ frac), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ~((e_is @ nat @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.45/0.72 thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42]), c_0_43]), c_0_44])]), c_0_45]), ['proof']). 0.45/0.72 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.45/0.72 # Parsed axioms : 562 0.45/0.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 395 0.45/0.72 # Initial clauses : 209 0.45/0.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.45/0.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 203 0.45/0.72 # Processed clauses : 391 0.45/0.72 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.45/0.72 # ...subsumed : 110 0.45/0.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 280 0.45/0.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 12 0.45/0.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.45/0.72 # Backward-subsumed : 8 0.45/0.72 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.45/0.72 # Generated clauses : 774 0.45/0.72 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 720 0.45/0.72 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.45/0.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7 0.45/0.72 # Paramodulations : 734 0.45/0.72 # Factorizations : 0 0.45/0.72 # NegExts : 0 0.45/0.72 # Equation resolutions : 13 0.45/0.72 # Total rewrite steps : 129 0.45/0.72 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional check models : 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.45/0.72 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 148 0.45/0.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28 0.45/0.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.45/0.72 # Negative unit clauses : 7 0.45/0.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 113 0.45/0.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 652 0.45/0.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 3920 0.45/0.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.45/0.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 132 0.45/0.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17909 0.45/0.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3984 0.45/0.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 117 0.45/0.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46 0.45/0.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.45/0.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5 0.45/0.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.45/0.72 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.45/0.72 # Condensation successes : 0 0.45/0.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 85372 0.45/0.72 0.45/0.72 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.45/0.72 # User time : 0.087 s 0.45/0.72 # System time : 0.015 s 0.45/0.72 # Total time : 0.102 s 0.45/0.72 # Maximum resident set size: 6404 pages 0.45/0.72 0.45/0.72 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.45/0.72 # User time : 0.235 s 0.45/0.72 # System time : 0.042 s 0.45/0.72 # Total time : 0.277 s 0.45/0.72 # Maximum resident set size: 2732 pages 0.45/0.72 % E---3.1 exiting 0.45/0.72 EOF